Skip to main content

Revisiting passing Parameters through EL - this time with functional techniques

The strangest thing about being a developer, to me, is that every time I think I have perfected my technique for something, I revisit it after some time away and find a better way of doing things. So this is my 4th iteration of how to pass and accept parameters through Expression Language. Allow me to introduce... the Mapper. (Quick side note: my old GetMap was based on the Map interface. Mapper is based on DataObject just because it is smaller. Mapper could just as easily implement Map if you prefer.

Just as a quick reminder, the goal is to accept a parameter through Expression Language, like so:
styleClass="#{MyViewBean.buttonStyle['MyButton']}"

public class Mapper implements DataObject, Serializable {
public static interface Function {
Object map(Object in);
}
private final Function func; //This will be an anonymous implementation

public Mapper(Function func) {
this.func = func;
}
public Object getValue(Object key){
return func.map(key); // Call the anonymous Function method
}
public void setValue(Object key, Object value){
throw new UnsupportedOperationException();
}
public Class<?> getType(Object key) {
throw new UnsupportedOperationException();
}
public boolean isReadOnly(Object key) {
return true;
}
}

This came from studying functional programming concepts and I believe this is a vast improvement on my earlier versions. It is certainly much easier to read and implement, and the most flexible. It works like this:

public class MyViewBean {
private String activeButton = "MyButton";

private final Mapper btnStyleMapper = new Mapper(
new Mapper.Function(){ // define the translation function
public Object map(Object in) {
return getActiveButton().equalsIgnoreCase(in.toString()) ? " active" : "";
}
}
);

public String getActiveButton() {
return this.activeButton;
}

public void setActiveButton(String activeButton) {
this.activeButton = activeButton;
}

public Object getButtonStyle() {
return btnStyleMapper;
}
}
One thing this version does sacrifice is strongly-typed objects due to the DataObject interface. You could use Map for better typing, but the endpoints are still going to be Objects, so it might be best to just validate the input and be on your way.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Pass data between XPages and existing LS scripts

I'm working on modernizing a fairly hefty application with a lot of existing script libraries which we want to leverage within the XPages environment. Here is a technique that works very well. First, create an in-memory document in SSJS. We can set any input values needed for the back end. Then we pass that document to a LS Agent which can work it's magic using the values set in SSJS and use the same document to return values back to the XPage. Here is how it works in detail:

Fixing FontAwesome for Windows 10

I ran into an issue with FontAwesome a few months back, where a NoCache header was being injected at the server and FA was broken for any partial refresh. I convinced the admin to reverse that setting and all was well until last week... We had some users who were not getting any icons to appear. Ever. We tracked it down to a new Windows 10 setting for IE11 which disallows untrusted fonts. Since we do not set security protocols for our users, and there is no chance of ever convincing those admins to change this policy that they explicitly turned on, I had to find a new solution. I did some searching and it turned out to not be too difficult. First, here is the original implementation. The theme: <control> <name>Icon.Search</name> <property mode="override"> <name>tagName</name> <value>i</value> </property> <property mode="concat"> <name>styleClass</name> <value>fa fa-search...

XPages Application Framework (Part 2 of ?)

In my last post, I offered a very rough overview of the framework I've been building and adapting. Full credit where it's due, I've been borrowing and adapting from Jesse Gallagher's XPages Scaffolding - an awesome project that I've learned a great deal dissecting. This is one of those projects that, if you make the effort to truly understand it, will give you entirely new tools and approaches for problems. As usual, I've learned the most changin g things and breaking them. My project differ s f rom Jesse's mostly in that it supports 8.5.3 and doesn't require any relaxed security permissions - bec ause I'm on 8.5.3 and because the admins h ere will not grant any relaxed permissions.